use-apify.com
n8n: guides & tutorials
n8n workflows for web data: HTTP nodes, webhooks, and Apify API runs in one canvas—self-host when you need control and ship JSON to databases or Slack.
10 articles
View all tags
n8n is a workflow tool you can self-host, with HTTP nodes, webhooks, and Apify API calls on one canvas. These guides cover building data pipelines that run Apify actors and ship JSON to databases or Slack.
n8n appeals to teams that want automation control and the option to host it themselves. Below you will find tutorials for triggering Apify from n8n, handling webhook responses, and routing results downstream.

TL;DR
- One
docker-compose.yml: n8n + LiteLLM + Twenty CRM + shared PostgreSQL + Redis + Caddy
- Measured idle RAM: ~1.7 GB; peak: ~2.5 GB (parallel workflow executions with live LiteLLM calls)
- Minimum Liquid Web tier: 8 GB Managed VPS (~$33–$40/mo)
- Zapier Pro + unmanaged OpenAI API + HubSpot Starter: ~$69 + variable + $50/mo vs ~$33/mo self-hosted
Most sales teams that want AI-augmented automation end up in one of two bad places: paying for Zapier Pro, a direct OpenAI API key they can't audit, and HubSpot CRM — three separate subscriptions that don't compose well and bill regardless of usage. Or they write fragile Python scripts that break on every API change and nobody wants to maintain.
This guide deploys the middle path: Twenty CRM for pipeline management, n8n for visual workflow automation, and LiteLLM as an OpenAI-compatible AI proxy — all on a single Liquid Web 8 GB VPS. n8n calls LiteLLM for every AI task (lead enrichment summaries, proposal draft generation, inbound form classification), and LiteLLM provides budget caps, model fallbacks, and a unified request log.

Enterprise competitive intelligence tools — Crayon, Klue, Kompyte, Similarweb — charge $300–$2,000/month (quote-based, plan-dependent) for competitive monitoring dashboards. This same monitoring can be built with Apify for data collection, Claude for analysis, n8n for orchestration, and a free dashboard — for under $50/month (starting cost; scales with competitor count, Actor fees, and proxy usage).
This guide builds it step by step: from identifying what to monitor, to automated daily scrapes, to AI-powered change detection that alerts your team in Slack when competitors make moves that matter.
TL;DR:
| Component | Tool | Cost |
|---|
| Data collection | Apify (5 competitors, daily) | ~$30/mo |
| Analysis | Claude API (change detection, summarization) | ~$5–15/mo |
| Orchestration | n8n (self-hosted) | $0 |
| Dashboard | Google Sheets or Grafana | $0 |
| Alerts | Slack webhooks | $0 |
| Total | | ~$35–45/mo |

Cloud API costs scale linearly with usage. Self-hosting Ollama + n8n + Coolify on a $20/month VPS removes per-token fees for local Ollama inference — you still pay for the VPS, bandwidth, and your time; throughput is limited by CPU/RAM. When workflows call Apify, email, or other SaaS APIs, data transits those providers — not only your server.
This guide covers the complete setup from bare VPS to production-ready AI pipeline, with official documentation links for every step.
TL;DR:
| Component | Role | Official docs |
|---|
| Coolify | Infrastructure manager (replaces Heroku/Vercel for self-hosting) | coolify.io/docs |
| Ollama | Local LLM inference (Llama 3.1, Mistral, DeepSeek) | ollama.com |
| n8n | Workflow orchestration (visual automation) | docs.n8n.io |
| Qdrant | Vector database for AI memory/RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) | qdrant.tech/documentation |
| PostgreSQL | Structured data storage | postgresql.org |
Prerequisites:
- A VPS with 4+ CPU cores, 8+ GB RAM, 80+ GB SSD ($16–$25/month range). Minimum 8 GB RAM required for running Llama 3.1 8B comfortably alongside n8n.
- A domain name pointed to the VPS IP
- Basic terminal/SSH knowledge
- 30–60 minutes of setup time

The n8n + Dify + Ollama stack is a common 2026 self-hosted pattern for teams that want open-source control over automation, LLM apps, and where models run: n8n runs event-driven workflows across SaaS and APIs; Dify ships LLM apps, agents, and knowledge bases; Ollama exposes a local OpenAI-compatible inference API on your hardware. None fully replaces the others, but teams often blur which layer owns which job.
This article maps each tool’s role, where capabilities overlap, how they compose into one architecture versus compete for the same budget and headcount, and a practical deployment roadmap you can adapt from a laptop toward production.
For how agent runtimes, MCP, and infra headlines affect wiring choices like these, see Top 10 AI and tech stories this week (March 17–24, 2026).

TL;DR by persona: Developers → n8n (self-host, Code nodes). Non-technical teams → Make.com (visual, affordable, AI). Maximum app coverage → Zapier (6,000+ apps, easiest). Startups watching cost → Make or self-hosted n8n. Enterprise → Zapier or Make with support contracts.
All three are visual, node-based automation platforms. They differ sharply on pricing, self-hosting, code support, and target user. This guide helps you choose and migrate.