Skip to main content

Apify vs Scrapy 2026: Which Web Scraping Tool Should You Use?

· 4 min read
Yassine El Haddad
Software Developer & Automation Specialist

I build production AI agents, web scrapers, and automation pipelines. Most of what I publish here comes from the actual problems they run into: proxies that get banned, anti-bot stacks that fingerprint your client, RAG that drifts when the underlying data moves. Stack: Python, TypeScript, Go, FastAPI, LangChain, Crawlee, Playwright, deployed on AWS, GCP, and Cloudflare.

Scrapy is the mature Python web crawling framework. Apify is a cloud platform (with Crawlee as its open-source framework) that handles infrastructure, scaling, and storage on top of Node.js.

They're not direct competitors — Scrapy is a code framework, Apify is a full platform — but teams frequently choose between them. This comparison covers where each excels.

Quick Summary​

ScrapyApify
LanguagePythonNode.js (Crawlee)
TypeFrameworkCloud platform + open-source framework
SetupLocal installManaged cloud, CLI
JavaScript renderingVia middlewareNative (PlaywrightCrawler)
Proxy rotationManual configBuilt-in
StorageManual (CSV, DB)Built-in Dataset, KV store
SchedulingExternal (cron)Built-in scheduler
ScalingSelf-managedManaged
PricingFreeFree tier + usage
Learning curveMediumLow–medium

Scrapy: Strengths​

1. Python ecosystem. If your team is Python-first, Scrapy integrates directly with pandas, SQLAlchemy, Celery, and the entire Python data stack.

2. Mature and battle-tested. Scrapy has been in production since 2008. There are thousands of community spiders, extensions, and middleware packages.

3. Full control. Every request pipeline stage is configurable — item pipelines, downloader middleware, spider middleware. Nothing is hidden.

4. Free and self-hostable. Zero licensing cost. Deploy on any VM.

import scrapy

class ProductSpider(scrapy.Spider):
name = "products"
start_urls = ["https://books.toscrape.com/"]

def parse(self, response):
for book in response.css("article.product_pod"):
yield {
"title": book.css("h3 a::attr(title)").get(),
"price": book.css(".price_color::text").get(),
"rating": book.css(".star-rating::attr(class)").get().split()[-1],
}

next_page = response.css("li.next a::attr(href)").get()
if next_page:
yield response.follow(next_page, self.parse)

Scrapy + Playwright:

pip install scrapy-playwright
playwright install chromium
class JsSpider(scrapy.Spider):
name = "js_page"

def start_requests(self):
yield scrapy.Request("https://spa.example.com", meta={"playwright": True})

def parse(self, response):
yield {"content": response.css(".data::text").get()}

Apify (Crawlee): Strengths​

1. JavaScript rendering out of the box. PlaywrightCrawler handles SPAs, dynamic content, and login flows with no middleware configuration.

2. Built-in infrastructure. Proxy rotation, request deduplication, persistent queue, dataset storage, scheduling — all available with zero boilerplate.

3. Cloud deployment in one command. apify push deploys your scraper to managed infrastructure with auto-scaling, monitoring, and logs.

4. No-code options. 70,000+ pre-built Actors in the Apify Store cover Amazon, Instagram, LinkedIn, Google Maps, and more — without writing code.

import { CheerioCrawler } from 'crawlee';
import { Actor } from 'apify';

await Actor.init();

const crawler = new CheerioCrawler({
async requestHandler({ $, enqueueLinks }) {
const products = [];
$("article.product_pod").each((_, el) => {
products.push({
title: $(el).find("h3 a").attr("title"),
price: $(el).find(".price_color").text(),
});
});
await Actor.pushData(products);
await enqueueLinks({ selector: "li.next a" });
},
});

await crawler.run(["https://books.toscrape.com/"]);
await Actor.exit();

Head-to-Head: Key Scenarios​

Scenario 1: Python data science team​

Winner: Scrapy. Python is already in the stack. Scrapy items flow directly into pandas DataFrames or SQLAlchemy inserts.

Scenario 2: Dynamic SPA with login​

Winner: Apify/Crawlee. PlaywrightCrawler with useSessionPool: true handles this cleanly. Scrapy needs scrapy-playwright middleware and more configuration.

Scenario 3: Large-scale cloud deployment​

Winner: Apify. Managed proxies, auto-scaling, and built-in storage make production deployment straightforward. Scrapy requires a Scrapy Cloud subscription (paid) or custom infrastructure.

Scenario 4: Quick scrape of a single site​

Winner: Scrapy (Python) or Crawlee (JS) — both fine. Neither has a clear edge for a single-site project.

Scenario 5: No-code/low-code business users​

Winner: Apify. The Apify Store's pre-built Actors cover most common targets. Scrapy is code-only.

Scenario 6: GDPR/compliance-strict environment​

Winner: Self-hosted Scrapy. Full control over where data goes. Apify stores data on Apify's servers (EU storage available, but external).


Pricing Comparison​

ScrapyApify
FrameworkFreeFree (Crawlee)
Cloud hostingZyte (formerly Scrapy Cloud): from $25/monthApify cloud: $5/month free, then $19/month
StorageYour own databaseIncluded in Apify
ProxyYour costApify Proxy included

Decision Framework​

Use Scrapy if:

  • Your team is Python-only
  • You need deep integration with Python data tools
  • You're self-hosting on your own infrastructure
  • You want maximum control over every request pipeline step

Use Apify if:

  • Your project is JavaScript-heavy
  • You want cloud deployment without managing servers
  • You need scheduling, storage, and proxy rotation out of the box
  • You want to reuse pre-built Actors for common targets
  • You're building on Node.js / the Crawlee framework

Start with Apify for free → | Scrapy documentation →

Common mistakes and fixes

Scrapy spider doesn't render JavaScript-heavy pages.

Use scrapy-playwright or scrapy-splash middleware. Alternatively, switch to Crawlee/Apify which has PlaywrightCrawler built in.

Apify Actor hits memory limits on large crawls.

Reduce maxConcurrency, enable disk storage for RequestQueue, and use CheerioCrawler instead of PlaywrightCrawler where possible.

Advertise on this page